NEW DELHI: Terming the contents of a page hosted on Wikipedia as "prima facie contemptuous," Delhi HC ordered the platform Wednesday to take it down within 36 hours.
The page had criticised a earlier order directing Wikipedia to reveal names of users who wrote alleged defamatory content against a news agency.
"We are of view that description of order and the judge is prima facie contemptuous and amounts to interference in proceedings," noted a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, ordering removal of page. It ordered the removal of posts discussing the ongoing hearing on Wikipedia.
"The court was disturbed to note that observations made during the last hearing were opened for discussion on the website, compounding the contempt," HC remarked. Senior advocate Akhil Sibal , representing Wikipedia, stated that neither the page commenting on the judge's order nor the discussion page were created by the platform.
During the hearing on Wikipedia's appeal against the earlier order, the bench asked Sibal if the platform would act against malicious comments. Sibal replied that comments would be removed if directed by the court, citing the platform's self-regulation policy.
However, HC remained unconvinced, pointing out that "safe harbour" protection under the new IT Rules doesn't apply since Wikipedia refused to reveal user details despite a court order .
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing edits labeling the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt and seeks removal of the content and Rs 2 crore in damages.
The page had criticised a earlier order directing Wikipedia to reveal names of users who wrote alleged defamatory content against a news agency.
"We are of view that description of order and the judge is prima facie contemptuous and amounts to interference in proceedings," noted a bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, ordering removal of page. It ordered the removal of posts discussing the ongoing hearing on Wikipedia.
"The court was disturbed to note that observations made during the last hearing were opened for discussion on the website, compounding the contempt," HC remarked. Senior advocate Akhil Sibal , representing Wikipedia, stated that neither the page commenting on the judge's order nor the discussion page were created by the platform.
During the hearing on Wikipedia's appeal against the earlier order, the bench asked Sibal if the platform would act against malicious comments. Sibal replied that comments would be removed if directed by the court, citing the platform's self-regulation policy.
However, HC remained unconvinced, pointing out that "safe harbour" protection under the new IT Rules doesn't apply since Wikipedia refused to reveal user details despite a court order .
The defamation suit accuses Wikipedia of allowing edits labeling the news agency as a "propaganda tool" for the govt and seeks removal of the content and Rs 2 crore in damages.
You may also like
Canada intel boss flagged 'Pak role' in 'extremism'
Liam Payne dies aged 31 after One Direction star falls from third floor of hotel
Luke Littler 'signs major TV deal' as darts star set to join Freddie Flintoff on screen
Tennis news: Carlos Alcaraz pairs up with Roger Federer as Rafa Nadal eyes new job
Had no proof, only intel when we first accused India: Justin Trudeau
Nikita Mazepin speaks out on potential F1 return after driver's sanctions were removed
ROYAL FAMILY RECAP: Prince Harry and Meghan's triple 'snub' shows 'tide is turning'
Erik ten Hag has huge injury list as Manchester United problems continue to mount
Raphael Varane played final 11 years of career 'on one knee' - including at Man Utd
Alia Bhatt Lauds Kriti Sanon, Kajol Starrer Do Patti Trailer, Don't Miss TBMAUJ Actress' Reaction
Fire At Recycling Facility Near Rogers Airport Prompts Warning, Videos Surface Of Massive Smoke | WATCH
Railways told to pay Rs 4.7 lakh to passenger for bag theft
Bikers gun down TMC man in Bengal
Christopher Biggins fumes he's left with 'cheques for 15p' after shows are sold off
Baba Siddique Murder Case: Investigating The Real Estate Nexus With Underworld Ties
Black magic on snake-bitten man in MP hospital
Ant McPartlin takes a dig at BGT judge Bruno Tonioli after new judge KSI makes debut
'Custodial Interrogation Needed To Advocate Who Forged High Court Orders': Bombay HC
Thomas Tuchel explains his exciting England tactics - 'What English football is all about!'
Dog's Halloween-inspired transformation sparks outrage online