NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of transparent governance and emphasises the legal principle of ‘contra proferentem’, reinforcing the need for clear communication in administrative processes, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ( NCDRC ) has sided with a retired head constable from the para-military service , ordering Haryana govt to allocate him a residential plot in Hisar, in a decision that reverses a previous order of the state consumer commission.
Contra proferentem is a rule of contract interpretation that states that an ambiguous contract term should be construed against the drafter of the contract.
Retired personnel Naresh Kumar had got the plot of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) through a draw under the reservation criteria for ex-servicemen in Feb 2014. But later govt cancelled the allotment citing that he did not fall in the category. Following this, Kumar challenged the cancellation of the plot in district consumer commission, which ruled in his favour. Yet, HUDA appealed to the state commission, which upheld the cancellation but ordered it to refund the earnest money with 12% interest.
Kumar contested the state commission’s ruling at NCDRC, arguing that he qualified as an ex-serviceman based on a HUDA circular specifying a 10% reservation for defence personnel and ex-servicemen, including those from paramilitary forces. HUDA contended that the draw brochure clearly delineated reservation categories and excluded paramilitary personnel from the ex-servicemen category.
Hearing the arguments, the NCDRC bench comprising members Sudip Ahluwalia and Rohit Kumar Singh bench referred to three documents available in public domain — HUDA brochure, letter of HUDA administrator of 1997 mentioning 10% quota for ex-servicemen and a subsequent letter of 1998 specifying 2% quota for paramilitary personnel.
The bench found that there was no explicit mention excluding retired paramilitary personnel from eligibility. It said that the state commission had failed to recognise that Kumar was not seeking special treatment but was entitled to the benefits outlined in the reservation criteria.
Passing the order for allotment of plot at the at of Feb 2014 when the original allotment was done, the NCDRC bench said, “The rule of contra proferentem is applicable in this case because the ambiguity and the consequent inadequate clarity has been created by the respondents and hence, the benefit of doubt is to be given to the petitioner on account of which they cannot unilaterally withdraw the allotment made by them to the petitioner.”
Contra proferentem is a rule of contract interpretation that states that an ambiguous contract term should be construed against the drafter of the contract.
Retired personnel Naresh Kumar had got the plot of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) through a draw under the reservation criteria for ex-servicemen in Feb 2014. But later govt cancelled the allotment citing that he did not fall in the category. Following this, Kumar challenged the cancellation of the plot in district consumer commission, which ruled in his favour. Yet, HUDA appealed to the state commission, which upheld the cancellation but ordered it to refund the earnest money with 12% interest.
Kumar contested the state commission’s ruling at NCDRC, arguing that he qualified as an ex-serviceman based on a HUDA circular specifying a 10% reservation for defence personnel and ex-servicemen, including those from paramilitary forces. HUDA contended that the draw brochure clearly delineated reservation categories and excluded paramilitary personnel from the ex-servicemen category.
Hearing the arguments, the NCDRC bench comprising members Sudip Ahluwalia and Rohit Kumar Singh bench referred to three documents available in public domain — HUDA brochure, letter of HUDA administrator of 1997 mentioning 10% quota for ex-servicemen and a subsequent letter of 1998 specifying 2% quota for paramilitary personnel.
The bench found that there was no explicit mention excluding retired paramilitary personnel from eligibility. It said that the state commission had failed to recognise that Kumar was not seeking special treatment but was entitled to the benefits outlined in the reservation criteria.
Passing the order for allotment of plot at the at of Feb 2014 when the original allotment was done, the NCDRC bench said, “The rule of contra proferentem is applicable in this case because the ambiguity and the consequent inadequate clarity has been created by the respondents and hence, the benefit of doubt is to be given to the petitioner on account of which they cannot unilaterally withdraw the allotment made by them to the petitioner.”
You may also like
'Necessary for entire country to... ': Congress on India-Canada diplomatic fallout
Mum's tribute to 'happy and ambitious' British influencer who plunged from 630ft Spain bridge
US Navy jet with two onboard crashes near Mount Rainier, search operation under way
Ajman introduces government prepaid card for service payments
Morocco World Cup bid sees thousands of dogs slaughtered in horrifying clean-up
Former MLA Munna Shukla surrenders before court in Brij Bihari murder case
Cong faces internal rift over Rahul Mamkootathil's candidature for Palakkad bypoll
Cong can't demand K'taka CM's resignation as Gandhi family is involved in scams: Pralhad Joshi
Rakul Preet Suffers Deadlift Injury: Ways To Strengthen Your Back Muscles To Prevent Strain
Peter Kay returns to TV in exciting Christmas role in major BBC comedy
'No Hard Evidence': Justin Trudeau's BIG Confession Amid Escalating India-Canada Diplomatic Row Over Nijjar Killing
Liverpool international break health check: Full injury and fitness report for first team stars
Yatra's Subsidiary Faces Insolvency Proceedings
Salute flag, chant 'Bharat Mata ki Jai': MP HC conditions for bail to accused
"Over 60 lakh members enrolled in BJP in Assam so far": CM Himanta Biswa Sarma
Cost of Italy's answer to Rwanda scheme laid bare as migrants are £15k each to deport
Bomb threats impact 7 flights on Wed; govt says agencies pursuing all cases actively
FSSAI Food Safety Guidelines While Buying Food Products, 6 Tips Identify Purity Of Kitchen Staple
Special features available in Vivo X200 series
Why does the human body freeze due to fear?